Acts19:7
Previous VerseTranslation
There were in all about twelve men.
Go to footnote numberParaphrase
When all of them were taken into account, the group of families was sufficient [to fully give God glory and demonstrate His power].
Footnotes
1
“Twelve men” means “full, sufficient or complete number of families.” In this case, what were they sufficient for? The context was that of confirmation of the control of the Holy Spirit in their lives to enable them to live lives that glorify God and demonstrate His power. When a sufficient number of people or families are used to give God glory and to demonstrate His power, each in their own way, the result is a multifaceted revelation of how God works that can touch a wide variety of people who fit in a variety of different categories. (I think the use of 12 here is symbolic, in part, because only ten Jewish men were required to have an operational synagogue.)
WHAT DID IT SOUND LIKE?
That is what everyone wants to know. But it appears that God left the answer to that question very open, probably because there would be a variety of expressions of this gift; they would not sound the same.
WERE PUBLIC DISPLAYS OF UNKNOWN TONGUES RARE OR COMMON IN ACTS?
Whether or not speaking in tongues was common or rare in Acts is open for debate.
Speaking in tongues in a public setting was only recorded to have happened three or four times in the book of Acts – on the day of Pentecost (ch 2), at the house of Cornelius (ch 10), in Ephesus (ch 19), and it may be implied in the story of Simon the sorcerer (ch 8). At first glance this makes it sound like speaking in tongues was rare in the time that is covered by the book of Acts.
However, it also appears that speaking in tongues was a confirming sign from God indicating that God accepts Gentiles, and that someone was under the control of the Holy Spirit. This makes it seem like speaking in tongues happened significantly more times than the few times it was recorded. The same could be said of things like healings – not near all of the healings done by the apostles were recorded.
So we cannot draw a definitive conclusion either way on this matter.
HOW WAS THE INFILLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT MANIFESTED IN ACTS?
The book of Acts records at least 16 different ways in which the Holy Spirit’s presence in, and control of someone’s life were evident. Thus, speaking in tongues was not the only proof of the Holy Spirit’s control; it was one of several proofs.
Here are the ones I have found, but there may be more:
A changed life Acts ch 9
Burning the paraphernalia of witchcraft, 19:19
Wonders and miracles including healings, 2:43, 4:3 & 33, 5:12 & 15, 8:13,
Casting out demons, 5:16,
1 man raised from the dead, 20:9-12
Generosity and self-less giving 2:44, 4:32-35,
Acting boldly and with courage 2:29, 5:29-32,
Discerning what was humanly indiscernible 5:3
Rejoicing in suffering for The Name 5:41
Martyrdom accompanied by miracles 6:15 & 7:56
Forgiving one’s persecutors and killers 7:59
Being translated to another place 8:39-40,
Speaking in tongues 2:4&6, (8:18?), 10:46, 19:6
Surviving danger in a miraculous way 14:19, 28:3-6
Preaching with God-glorifying results 2:37
Lots of people getting saved 2:41, 4:4, 6:7
The proper use of tongues is indeed a manifestation of the Holy Spirit’s power. However, there were a number of ways the infilling of the Holy Spirit manifested itself. Tongues was not the only way and neither did everyone speak in tongues.
TONGUES IN ACTS FOLLOWED THE PATTERN SET BY PENTECOST
It appears that the form of tongues spoken at Pentecost, speaking in a human language unknown to the speaker, set the pattern that was followed in the other cases recorded in the book of Acts. In my estimation, what we read about in Acts cannot be the type of tongues we typically hear today.
Even though we are not told, we are forced to assume that the situations described in Acts 10 (the house of Cornelius) and Acts 19 (Ephesus), had people present who needed the Gospel shared with them in their own language.
Acts 19 specifically says that there were about 12 men present. We don’t know if it was only men, or if there were women, children and servants present also. I know from having grown up on the mission field and having been a missionary myself for six years, that a crowd gathers very quickly. In my estimation, even if those participating in the meeting, those conversing directly with Paul, were only men, it is highly probable that there were women, children and servants within earshot. It is likely that God turned the attention of the men who were newly filled with His Spirit to their servants and caused them to want to share the gospel message with them. In this way God accomplished two things at the same time; He confirmed to them that they had been filled with His spirit, and He reached people with the message of salvation that otherwise would have been struggling to understand it on a deep level. The servants were often from other lands; they could understand the commands they were normally given, but the language of spiritual matters was not something they heard very often in their third or fourth language.
WE SHOULD ASK OURSELVES THESE QUESTIONS
Have I given the Holy Spirit the reins of my life?
If so, do I take them back sometimes?
If I were accused of being a follower of Jesus, would there be enough evidence to convict me?
Does my life produce any evidence that I am filled with God’s Spirit? (Some of the common examples should be: a changed life, selfless giving, courage, special discernment, rejoicing in suffering for The Name, forgiving those who mistreat me.)