Troublesome Topic: Evolution is a Theological Issue Not a Scientific Issue

Lesson 5 of 10

Genesis 3:6

Translation

When the woman saw that the tree was good for food,

and that it was pleasant to the eyes,

and a tree desirable to make one wise,

she took of its fruit and ate,

and she also gave it to her husband

with her

and he ate. (See comments below.)

Paraphrase

When the woman considered and understood that this tree was a source of food just like every other tree, and it had a very appealing appearance so it would probably taste really good, and besides that it was able to make her wise, she took some of its fruit and ate it; she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he also ate it. (See comments below.)

Evolution is a Theological Issue Not a Scientific Issue

In the end, the debate over creation/evolution comes down to this issue of sin and its key consequence – death. If pressed hard enough, or if you just listen long enough, you will hear an evolutionist finally get to the bottom line, the root of the problem. You will then see that the primary motivation behind evolution is not a scientific question at all, it is a theological question. That question is usually stated something like this: “If there is a God, and if God is so good, then why is my life so hard? Why is there so much suffering and death?” We know that the answer to that question is the presence of sin. But many people don’t want to talk about sin because that turns the responsibility back on us. They would rather point the finger at God and accuse Him of wrong-doing, than change the way they live. Notice that the question is inherently self-centered – “Why is my life so hard?” We want life to be easy and we assume something is wrong if it is not easy. Who is to blame? Well, it must be God. When we find out that the ones to blame are Adam, Eve and ourselves, that changes the picture.

Granted, suffering is not fun, and some of the stuff we go through seems overwhelming. But it is not all God’s fault. Our suffering does not make Him an evil God, or eliminate His existence. Rather it shows how desperate He is to reconcile us back to Himself. Remember this, although we suffer, God is not afraid to suffer with us, in fact He caused His Son to suffer more than we can ever imagine. He did this for our good. The price is high, but He pays more of it than we do.

The next lesson is: The Implications of a God Who Walks with Us

Footnotes

1: “good for food”

The emphasis of this statement is that the tree seemed to be like any other tree in the orchard making the prohibition against eating it seem all the more ridiculous.

2: “pleasant to the eyes”

By now she wanted to eat some of that fruit and was looking for any reason that would convince her. Even if the fruit was equally attractive as other fruits are, and its appearance was not truly special, she had convinced herself that it was special and therefore, it had to taste special. Sinful desire has a tendency of making something bigger and better than it is. A wise man once told me, “Sin is always more attractive when we imagine it than when we do it. Good is more attractive when we do it than when we imagine it.”

Was it an apple? See my comments related to Genesis 2:17.

3: “make one wise”

Notice how, in the first statement she is saying that the tree is just like the others around it, while in the second and third statements she is admitting that she thinks it is special. The first statement addresses how unwarranted God’s prohibition was, while the second and third ones point to how badly she wants to do this.

There was no indication as to why they needed more wisdom, or why they needed to know the difference between good and evil. At this point evil was just a hypothetical possibility, not a real-world reality. But the idea that she could become like God Himself had caught fire within her. Also there was no thought about consequences, because the consequence that God had mentioned had already been set aside by the serpent. She wanted this so badly that she convinced herself that the serpent was right and there would be no negative consequences, only good ones. She believed the serpent over God, based not on their authority, nor on their accomplishments, but based solely on her desire.

4: “and ate”

Notice that she did not fall down dead. There was no immediate consequence of physical death, and there may have been no other immediate consequence either. If she did begin to feel shame right away she may have hidden that fact from Adam until after he joined her in the act. She did not want to be suffering the consequence alone so she acted normal in order to convince him to join her.

5: "her man"

In this instance Adam is referred to as her man, i.e. her husband, almost as if he belonged to her, or as if she was now the leader. Perhaps this statement is designed to indicate the complete perversion by Eve of the purpose for which God had made her – to be a helper and rescuer for Adam, not his ruler or leader. By taking the lead she had now become his destroyer.

6: “with her”

The reason for including such a statement appears to indicate that He did not fulfill his role of leader, protector, and spiritual guide. I think the insertion of this statement is intended to tell us that he was with her through the whole process and yet was not able to convince her to refrain from doing it, or did not try to convince her.

Some commentators have trouble believing he was there the whole time, but that is indeed what the text seems to imply. Also, if Adam was not with her the whole time, where was he? It’s not like he had to run errands. Managing the orchard was something they could do together. God had provided him with a beautiful companion created specifically to meet his needs; the logical assumption is that they went everywhere together.

Possibly, he wanted to eat the forbidden fruit as well. I envision this thing being a process that took a few days in which the pull of this temptation grew on both of them. The fact that the serpent spoke to Eve tells me that Adam was a bit more hesitant than she was. Satan knew that if he could get the woman, she would likely bring the man along too. In the end she took the reins and made something happen for both of them.

7: “he ate”

This event redirected the rest of human history. It set in motion everything we call bad, and it started the process of our ruination. In a word this was our self-destruction.